John O'Mahony v Keith Lowe & Anor [2013] IEHC 361 (25 July 2013)

John O'Mahony v Keith Lowe & Anor [2013] IEHC 361 (25 July 2013)

The plaintiff failed to meet the higher threshold required for a mandatory interlocutory injunction, as he did not establish a strong case likely to succeed at trial, and damages would be an adequate remedy for any loss. The balance of convenience also favoured refusal of the injunction.

Citation
[2013] IEHC 361
Parties
Plaintiff: John O'Mahony; First Defendant: Keith Lowe; Second Defendant: Douglas Newman Good Limited
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
25 July 2013
Procedural Posture
Plenary Summons / Interlocutory Application for Mandatory Injunction
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Receivership, Injunctions, Duties of Receiver, Mortgage Enforcement
Property Law Equity Receivership Injunctions Duties of Receiver Mortgage Enforcement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John O'Mahony

Plaintiff

Keith Lowe

First Defendant

Douglas Newman Good Limited

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Plenary Summons / Interlocutory Application for Mandatory Injunction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an interlocutory mandatory injunction compelling the first defendant to repair, renew and reinstate the mortgaged property
  2. 2 Whether the appointment of the first defendant as receiver should be extinguished and deemed void due to alleged negligent dereliction of duty

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff failed to meet the higher threshold required for a mandatory interlocutory injunction, as he did not establish a strong case likely to succeed at trial, and damages would be an adequate remedy for any loss. The balance of convenience also favoured refusal of the injunction.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Order dismissing the plaintiff’s application for interlocutory mandatory injunction