Padden v McDarby & Ors (Approved) [2023] IEHC 596 (03 November 2023)
Despite inordinate and inexcusable delay by the plaintiff, the balance of justice favours allowing the proceedings to continue as the prejudice to the plaintiff from dismissal outweighs any general prejudice to the defendants.
- Citation
- [2023] IEHC 596
- Parties
- Plaintiff: John Padden; Defendant: Michael McDarby; Defendant: Sean Acton; Defendant: Catherine McDarby practising under the style and title of Michael McDarby and Company Solicitors
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Negligence Proceedings / Motion to Dismiss for Delay
- Outcome
- motion to dismiss refused
- Legal Topics
- Delay in Proceedings, Dismissal for Delay, Balance of Justice, Prejudice, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Padden
Plaintiff
Michael McDarby
Defendant
Sean Acton
Defendant
Catherine McDarby practising under the style and title of Michael McDarby and Company Solicitors
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Negligence Proceedings / Motion to Dismiss for Delay
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff's delay in prosecuting the negligence claim is inordinate and inexcusable
- 2 Whether the balance of justice favours dismissal or allowing the proceedings to continue
Ratio Decidendi
Despite inordinate and inexcusable delay by the plaintiff, the balance of justice favours allowing the proceedings to continue as the prejudice to the plaintiff from dismissal outweighs any general prejudice to the defendants.
Court Disposition
motion to dismiss refused
Orders
- Plaintiff entitled to costs, subject to stay on execution pending outcome of proceedings
- Matter adjourned for submissions on orders
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment