Walters & anor v Lexington Services Ltd (Approved) [2020] IEHC 595 (19 November 2020)

Walters & anor v Lexington Services Ltd (Approved) [2020] IEHC 595 (19 November 2020)

Lexington has established a stateable case of fraud and conspiracy against Mr. Connell and Mr. Karrer, and their joinder is necessary to ensure they are bound by the outcome and to allow for discovery/interrogatories; prejudice to existing parties is insufficient to outweigh necessity.

Citation
[2020] IEHC 595
Parties
Plaintiff/counterclaim Defendant: Mortimer John Walters; Plaintiff/counterclaim Defendant: Ronan Campbell; Defendant/counterclaim Plaintiff: Lexington Services Limited; Counterclaim Defendant: Anthology S.A.; Proposed Counterclaim Defendant: Brian Connell; Proposed Counterclaim Defendant: Florian Karrer
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
19 November 2020
Procedural Posture
Joinder Application in Civil Proceedings / Interlocutory
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Joinder of Parties, Fraud, Conspiracy, Patent Security, Receiver Appointment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mortimer John Walters

Plaintiff/counterclaim Defendant

Ronan Campbell

Plaintiff/counterclaim Defendant

Lexington Services Limited

Defendant/counterclaim Plaintiff

Anthology S.A.

Counterclaim Defendant

Brian Connell

Proposed Counterclaim Defendant

Florian Karrer

Proposed Counterclaim Defendant

Procedural Posture

Joinder Application in Civil Proceedings / Interlocutory

  1. 1 Whether Mr. Connell and Mr. Karrer should be joined as counterclaim defendants
  2. 2 Whether there is a stateable case of fraud and conspiracy against Mr. Connell and Mr. Karrer
  3. 3 Whether the appointment of receivers over Patent 807 was valid

Ratio Decidendi

Lexington has established a stateable case of fraud and conspiracy against Mr. Connell and Mr. Karrer, and their joinder is necessary to ensure they are bound by the outcome and to allow for discovery/interrogatories; prejudice to existing parties is insufficient to outweigh necessity.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Mr. Connell and Mr. Karrer joined as counterclaim defendants
  • Amendment to Counterclaim permitted