In the Matter of James and Grainne Farrell (Approved) [2025] IEHC 468 (19 August 2025)

In the Matter of James and Grainne Farrell (Approved) [2025] IEHC 468 (19 August 2025)

The issues raised in the Corcorans' motion were fully pleaded and determined in the plenary proceedings; therefore, the motion is spent and should be struck out with no order as to costs.

Citation
[2025] IEHC 468
Parties
Plaintiff: Joseph Corcoran; Defendant: Eassda Group Limited; Defendant: Eassda Ireland Limited; Defendant: Alastair Jackson; Notice Party: Promontoria Eagle Limited; Notice Party: Ken Fennell; Plaintiff: Ken Fennell; Defendant: Joseph Corcoran; Defendant: Katherine Corcoran; Plaintiff: Katherine Corcoran; Defendant: Promontoria Eagle Limited; Defendant: Ken Fennell
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
19 August 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Trial Motion Ruling
Outcome
motion struck out
Legal Topics
Receiver Appointment, Pleadings, Striking Out Motions, Building Agreement, Contract for Sale of Land
Civil Procedure Property Law Insolvency Receiver Appointment Pleadings Striking Out Motions Building Agreement Contract for Sale of Land

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Corcoran

Plaintiff

Eassda Group Limited

Defendant

Eassda Ireland Limited

Defendant

Alastair Jackson

Defendant

Promontoria Eagle Limited

Notice Party

Ken Fennell

Notice Party

Ken Fennell

Plaintiff

Joseph Corcoran

Defendant

Katherine Corcoran

Defendant

Katherine Corcoran

Plaintiff

Promontoria Eagle Limited

Defendant

Ken Fennell

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Post Trial Motion Ruling

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Ken Fennell was validly appointed as receiver over Eassda Ireland Limited and the site at 6 Glenair Manor
  2. 2 Whether claims regarding the building agreement and contract for sale should be struck out as at an end

Ratio Decidendi

The issues raised in the Corcorans' motion were fully pleaded and determined in the plenary proceedings; therefore, the motion is spent and should be struck out with no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

motion struck out

Orders

  • Motion of 18 December 2020 struck out as spent
  • No order as to costs of the motion