Howley v Moorehouse (Approved) [2023] IEHC 628 (10 November 2023)
The court has no jurisdiction to question the amount of tax and interest assessed and claimed, as the assessments are final and conclusive following the refusal of the defendant's appeal by the Tax Appeals Commission. Statutory interest is not discretionary and must be awarded as provided by law. The defendant has not established any arguable defence to the claim, and delay by the plaintiff in issuing proceedings does not provide a defence or constitute unjust enrichment. The court therefore grants summary judgment for the full amount claimed.
- Citation
- [2023] IEHC 628
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Joseph Howley; Defendant: Christopher Moorehouse
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Judgment Application / High Court Judgment on Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted for the plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Income Tax Assessment, Interest on Tax Debts, Appeals Process in Tax Matters, Unjust Enrichment, Delay in Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Howley
Plaintiff
Christopher Moorehouse
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / High Court Judgment on Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment for unpaid income tax and interest
- 2 Whether delay by the plaintiff in issuing proceedings disentitles him to claim interest for the period of delay
- 3 Whether the defendant has an arguable defence to the claim for tax and interest
Ratio Decidendi
The court has no jurisdiction to question the amount of tax and interest assessed and claimed, as the assessments are final and conclusive following the refusal of the defendant's appeal by the Tax Appeals Commission. Statutory interest is not discretionary and must be awarded as provided by law. The defendant has not established any arguable defence to the claim, and delay by the plaintiff in issuing proceedings does not provide a defence or constitute unjust enrichment. The court therefore grants summary judgment for the full amount claimed.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted for the plaintiff
Orders
- Final judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant in the sum of €2,026,454.48
- No 'liberty to apply' provision included in the order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment