Howley v Howard; Howley v McClean (Approved) [2024] IEHC 15 (16 January 2024)

Howley v Howard; Howley v McClean (Approved) [2024] IEHC 15 (16 January 2024)

The solicitor's contract is not champertous as it does not involve trafficking in litigation or division of the proceeds; it merely provides for ordinary legal costs subject to statutory adjudication. Even if champerty were present, it is not a defence to a certified tax debt. The tax assessments and certificates are final and conclusive, and the defendants' arguments do not disprove the amounts due.

Citation
[2024] IEHC 15
Parties
Plaintiff: Joseph Howley; Defendant: Paul Howard; Defendant: Una McClean
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
16 January 2024
Procedural Posture
Commercial Tax Recovery / Final Judgment After Plenary Hearing
Outcome
Judgment for plaintiff
Legal Topics
Champerty, Maintenance, Tax Recovery, Legal Costs, Fraudulent Misrepresentation
Tax Law Contract Law Legal Ethics Champerty Maintenance Tax Recovery Legal Costs Fraudulent Misrepresentation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Howley

Plaintiff

Paul Howard

Defendant

Una McClean

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Tax Recovery / Final Judgment After Plenary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the solicitor's contract is champertous and taints the proceedings
  2. 2 Whether the contract permits fraudulent misrepresentation regarding legal costs
  3. 3 Whether champerty is a valid defence to a certified tax debt

Ratio Decidendi

The solicitor's contract is not champertous as it does not involve trafficking in litigation or division of the proceeds; it merely provides for ordinary legal costs subject to statutory adjudication. Even if champerty were present, it is not a defence to a certified tax debt. The tax assessments and certificates are final and conclusive, and the defendants' arguments do not disprove the amounts due.

Court Disposition

Judgment for plaintiff

Orders

  • Defendants to pay certified tax debts and surcharges as specified
  • Statutory interest to accrue from date of claim