Arnold v. Windle [1999] IESC 33 (4th March, 1999)
Given the evidence of possible breach of constitutional justice by the District Judge in sentencing, the availability of an appeal may not be an adequate remedy; leave to apply for judicial review should be granted.
- Citation
- [1999] IESC 33
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: Robert Arnold; Respondent: Judge Desmond Windle; Respondent: The Director of Public Prosecutions
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From Refusal of Leave to Apply for Certiorari
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; leave to apply for judicial review granted.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Natural Justice, Discretionary Remedies, Alternative Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Arnold
Applicant/appellant
Judge Desmond Windle
Respondent
The Director of Public Prosecutions
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From Refusal of Leave to Apply for Certiorari
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the District Judge acted in excess of jurisdiction in sentencing the applicant
- 2 Whether refusal to accept mitigation evidence and requiring sworn testimony was unlawful
- 3 Whether judicial review is appropriate where an appeal is available
Ratio Decidendi
Given the evidence of possible breach of constitutional justice by the District Judge in sentencing, the availability of an appeal may not be an adequate remedy; leave to apply for judicial review should be granted.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; leave to apply for judicial review granted.
Orders
- Leave to apply for judicial review granted on the grounds set out in the applicant's statement of grounds dated 2nd November 1998.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment