Kelly v Ewing [2014] IESC 62 (07 November 2014)
The appeal fails because the High Court's order was made in accordance with law, the sums due were properly determined, the concession regarding the reduced plot was valid, all costs had been taxed, and Mr. Ewing's participation cured any alleged imperfection in service. Issues of social order and dignity are not relevant to the legal determination.
- Citation
- [2014] IESC 62
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Anthony Kelly; Respondent/appellant: Robert Ewing; Represented by Robert Ewing as Personal Representative: William Ewing (deceased)
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judgment Mortgages, Well Charging Order, Sale of Land, Priority of Encumbrances, Costs Taxation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Kelly
Plaintiff/respondent
Robert Ewing
Respondent/appellant
William Ewing (deceased)
Represented by Robert Ewing as Personal Representative
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court correctly granted a well charging order on the disputed lands
- 2 Whether the sums due and owing were properly determined
- 3 Whether the concession regarding the reduced plot was valid
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal fails because the High Court's order was made in accordance with law, the sums due were properly determined, the concession regarding the reduced plot was valid, all costs had been taxed, and Mr. Ewing's participation cured any alleged imperfection in service. Issues of social order and dignity are not relevant to the legal determination.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Motions to enlarge time and to admit further evidence dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment