C. (K.) v. F. (C.) [2003] IEHC 109 (16 December 2003)
No secret trust was established; the testatrix made no provision for the plaintiffs by will or otherwise; both plaintiffs are in want and without means; the testatrix failed in her moral duty to make proper provision for them; proper provision in all the circumstances is €200,000 for K. C. and €100,000 for B. C. F.
- Citation
- [2003] IEHC 109
- Parties
- Plaintiff: K. C.; Plaintiff: B. C. F.; Defendant: C. F.; Notice Party: M. C.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Section 117 Application Under Succession Act 1965 / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Application under section 117 granted in part.
- Legal Topics
- Moral Duty of Testator, Proper Provision for Children, Secret Trust, Distribution of Estate
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
K. C.
Plaintiff
B. C. F.
Plaintiff
C. F.
Defendant
M. C.
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Section 117 Application Under Succession Act 1965 / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the testatrix failed in her moral duty to make proper provision for the plaintiffs under section 117 of the Succession Act, 1965
- 2 Whether a secret trust was created in relation to the estate
Ratio Decidendi
No secret trust was established; the testatrix made no provision for the plaintiffs by will or otherwise; both plaintiffs are in want and without means; the testatrix failed in her moral duty to make proper provision for them; proper provision in all the circumstances is €200,000 for K. C. and €100,000 for B. C. F.
Court Disposition
Application under section 117 granted in part.
Orders
- K. C. is to receive €200,000 out of the estate.
- B. C. F. is to receive €100,000 out of the estate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment