Karen Hurley Ahern & Anor v Victor Moore & Anor [2013] IEHC 72 (01 February 2013)

Karen Hurley Ahern & Anor v Victor Moore & Anor [2013] IEHC 72 (01 February 2013)

Dr Moore was negligent in failing to properly apply the Filshie clips during the sterilisation procedure, resulting in an unwanted pregnancy. The first plaintiff is entitled to damages for pain, suffering, inconvenience, and trauma associated with the pregnancy, childbirth, and post-natal events up to Samuel's death. The second plaintiff is not entitled to damages as emotional distress and economic loss are not compensatable without psychiatric injury.

Citation
[2013] IEHC 72
Parties
Plaintiff: Karen Hurley Ahern; Plaintiff: Garrett Ahern; Defendant: Victor Moore; Defendant: Southern Health Board
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
01 February 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the first plaintiff; claim of second plaintiff dismissed
Legal Topics
Failed Sterilisation, Damages for Pain and Suffering, Remoteness of Damage, Compensation for Failed Sterilisation, Liability for Surgical Error

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Karen Hurley Ahern

Plaintiff

Garrett Ahern

Plaintiff

Victor Moore

Defendant

Southern Health Board

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Was Dr Moore negligent in performing the sterilisation procedure?
  2. 2 Is the first plaintiff entitled to damages for pain, suffering, and inconvenience of pregnancy and childbirth?
  3. 3 Is the second plaintiff entitled to damages for emotional distress and economic loss?

Ratio Decidendi

Dr Moore was negligent in failing to properly apply the Filshie clips during the sterilisation procedure, resulting in an unwanted pregnancy. The first plaintiff is entitled to damages for pain, suffering, inconvenience, and trauma associated with the pregnancy, childbirth, and post-natal events up to Samuel's death. The second plaintiff is not entitled to damages as emotional distress and economic loss are not compensatable without psychiatric injury.

Court Disposition

judgment for the first plaintiff; claim of second plaintiff dismissed

Orders

  • First plaintiff awarded €100,000 in general damages
  • Second plaintiff's claim for damages dismissed