McKenna v Kerry County Council & anor (Approved) [2020] IEHC 687 (15 December 2020)
The court held that an application for extension of time under s. 11(2)(c) of the Statute of Limitations 1957 (as amended) can be made retrospectively, provided the proceedings themselves were issued within the two-year period. However, solicitor's negligence is not a valid reason for delay in issuing proceedings, and the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence to justify the delay. Therefore, the extension of time should not be granted.
- Citation
- [2020] IEHC 687
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Keith McKenna; First Defendant: Kerry County Council; Second Defendant: Angela McAllen
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Circuit Appeal / High Court Appeal From Circuit Court Order Extending Time to Bring Defamation Proceedings
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; extension of time refused.
- Legal Topics
- Statute of Limitations, Extension of Time, Defamation Proceedings, Jurisdiction, Solicitor Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Keith McKenna
Plaintiff
Kerry County Council
First Defendant
Angela McAllen
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Circuit Appeal / High Court Appeal From Circuit Court Order Extending Time to Bring Defamation Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an application for extension of time under s. 11(2)(c) of the Statute of Limitations 1957 (as amended) can be made retrospectively after the two-year period for bringing defamation proceedings has expired
- 2 Whether solicitor's negligence is a valid reason for delay in bringing defamation proceedings
- 3 Whether failure to file a verifying affidavit within time precludes extension of time
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that an application for extension of time under s. 11(2)(c) of the Statute of Limitations 1957 (as amended) can be made retrospectively, provided the proceedings themselves were issued within the two-year period. However, solicitor's negligence is not a valid reason for delay in issuing proceedings, and the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence to justify the delay. Therefore, the extension of time should not be granted.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; extension of time refused.
Orders
- Order of the Circuit Court granting extension of time set aside.
- Plaintiff's application for extension of time under s. 11(2)(c) refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment