Weldon v. Mooney [2001] IEHC 3 (25th January, 2001)

Weldon v. Mooney [2001] IEHC 3 (25th January, 2001)

The pleadings disclose a reasonable cause of action only if the Defendants knowingly permitted persons to use the luggage compartment and drove the bus in knowledge of the Plaintiff's presence; otherwise, the mere absence of a lock does not constitute negligence. The application to strike out is refused and the claim may proceed.

Citation
[2001] IEHC 3
Parties
Plaintiff: Keith Weldon; Second Defendant: Jimmy Campbell Coaches (Fingal Coaches); First Defendant: First Defendant (bus driver, unnamed)
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Application to Strike Out Pleadings for No Reasonable Cause of Action
Outcome
Application to strike out pleadings refused; claim to proceed to trial.
Legal Topics
Negligence, Duty of Care, Trespasser Liability, Reckless Disregard, Voluntary Assumption of Risk, Contributory Negligence
Tort Law Occupiers' Liability Negligence Duty of Care Trespasser Liability Reckless Disregard Voluntary Assumption of Risk Contributory Negligence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Keith Weldon

Plaintiff

Jimmy Campbell Coaches (Fingal Coaches)

Second Defendant

First Defendant (bus driver, unnamed)

First Defendant

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury / Application to Strike Out Pleadings for No Reasonable Cause of Action

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the pleadings disclose a reasonable cause of action against the Defendants for negligence
  2. 2 Whether the Defendants owed a duty of care to the Plaintiff as a trespasser under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1995
  3. 3 Whether the Defendants acted with reckless disregard for the Plaintiff's safety

Ratio Decidendi

The pleadings disclose a reasonable cause of action only if the Defendants knowingly permitted persons to use the luggage compartment and drove the bus in knowledge of the Plaintiff's presence; otherwise, the mere absence of a lock does not constitute negligence. The application to strike out is refused and the claim may proceed.

Court Disposition

Application to strike out pleadings refused; claim to proceed to trial.

Orders

  • Plaintiff's claim may proceed against both Defendants.