Tyrrell v Wright & Ors (Approved) [2021] IEHC 739 (26 November 2021)
Discovery is confined to documents relevant to the issues as pleaded. The court granted limited discovery only for documents directly relating to the validity of the receiver's appointment, refusing other categories as overly broad, irrelevant, or already covered by agreed discovery.
- Citation
- [2021] IEHC 739
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ken Tyrrell; Defendant: David Wright; Defendant: Rope Walk Car Park Ltd; Defendant: Launceston Property Finance Limited Designated Activity Company; Defendant: Pepper Finance Corporation Designated Activity Company
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application for Discovery
- Outcome
- Limited discovery granted
- Legal Topics
- Discovery, Receiver Appointment, Mortgage Enforcement, Liquidation, Counterclaim
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ken Tyrrell
Plaintiff
David Wright
Defendant
Rope Walk Car Park Ltd
Defendant
Launceston Property Finance Limited Designated Activity Company
Defendant
Pepper Finance Corporation Designated Activity Company
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Discovery
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether additional categories of discovery should be ordered beyond those agreed
- 2 Whether documents relating to the appointment of the receiver are discoverable
- 3 Whether documents regarding the sale of properties at undervalue are relevant and discoverable
Ratio Decidendi
Discovery is confined to documents relevant to the issues as pleaded. The court granted limited discovery only for documents directly relating to the validity of the receiver's appointment, refusing other categories as overly broad, irrelevant, or already covered by agreed discovery.
Court Disposition
Limited discovery granted
Orders
- Discovery ordered of any deed of mortgage under which Mr. Tyrrell was appointed as receiver and manager, and documents evidencing his appointment as receiver and manager.
- No order for discovery in respect of other disputed categories.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment