Payne v Electricity Supply Board (Approved) [2021] IEHC 512 (16 July 2021)
The €66,000 payment was not described or intended as statutory compensation for loss under Section 53(5) of the Electricity (Supply) Act 1927, but as a payment for cooperation with construction. It was not linked to compensation for loss, nor made subject to deduction from statutory compensation. Therefore, it is...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] IEHC 512
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Kenneth Payne; Defendant: Electricity Supply Board
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case Stated / Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Question answered: €66,000 not to be taken into account by Property Arbitrator in compensation assessment.
- Legal Topics
- Compensation for Compulsory Acquisition, Statutory Interpretation, Wayleave, Public Authority Payments
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenneth Payne
Plaintiff
Electricity Supply Board
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Special Case Stated / Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether €66,000 paid to Mr. Payne should be taken into account by the Property Arbitrator in assessing statutory compensation under Section 53(5) of the Electricity (Supply) Act 1927
Ratio Decidendi
The €66,000 payment was not described or intended as statutory compensation for loss under Section 53(5) of the Electricity (Supply) Act 1927, but as a payment for cooperation with construction. It was not linked to compensation for loss, nor made subject to deduction from statutory compensation. Therefore, it is not to be taken into account by the Property Arbitrator in assessing compensation.
Court Disposition
Question answered: €66,000 not to be taken into account by Property Arbitrator in compensation assessment.
Orders
- Matter listed for mention on 27 July 2021 at 10:30am to hear parties on any issues arising, including costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment