Payne V Meath County Council, Ireland And The Attorney General (Approved) [2025] IEHC 540 (14 October 2025)
The statutory provisions are clear that once the planning authority grants permission and no appeal is lodged within the statutory period, the grant is valid. The existence of both a grant and a subsequent appeal due to judicial review is not addressed by the Act, and the court cannot rewrite the statute to provide...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] IEHC 540
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenneth Payne; Respondent: Meath County Council; Respondent: Ireland; Respondent: The Attorney General; Notice Party: Breedon Cement Ireland Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Application for Stay Pending Determination of Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Application for stay refused
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interpretation, Planning Permission, Judicial Review, Environmental Impact Assessment, Habitats Directive, Public Law, Balance of Justice, Interlocutory Relief
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenneth Payne
Applicant
Meath County Council
Respondent
Ireland
Respondent
The Attorney General
Respondent
Breedon Cement Ireland Limited
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Stay Pending Determination of Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a stay should be granted on the implementation of planning permission pending determination of judicial review
- 2 Whether the existence of both a grant of planning permission and a live appeal is permissible under the Planning and Development Act 2000
- 3 Whether the balance of justice favours granting a stay
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory provisions are clear that once the planning authority grants permission and no appeal is lodged within the statutory period, the grant is valid. The existence of both a grant and a subsequent appeal due to judicial review is not addressed by the Act, and the court cannot rewrite the statute to provide for a stay. The applicant failed to provide evidence of harm or breach of EU law, and the balance of justice does not favour granting a stay.
Court Disposition
Application for stay refused
Orders
- Refusal of application for stay on implementation of planning permission
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment