Lindsay -v- Finnerty & Ors [2011] IEHC 403 (25 October 2011)
Both defendants are concurrent wrongdoers under Section 11 of the Civil Liability Act 1961, as their acts caused the same damage to the plaintiff, regardless of whether the incidents were successive or simultaneous. Liability is joint and several, with apportionment of 80% to Mr Finnerty and 20% to Mr Kelly.
- Citation
- [2011] IEHC 403
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Kerrill Lindsay; Defendant: David Finnerty; Defendant: Thomas Kelly; Defendant: Motor Insurers Bureau of Ireland
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury / Assessment of Damages and Apportionment of Liability
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiff against first and second defendants on a joint and several basis.
- Legal Topics
- Concurrent Wrongdoers, Apportionment of Liability, Road Traffic Accident, Personal Injury, Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kerrill Lindsay
Plaintiff
David Finnerty
Defendant
Thomas Kelly
Defendant
Motor Insurers Bureau of Ireland
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Assessment of Damages and Apportionment of Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 Are the defendants concurrent wrongdoers under Section 11 of the Civil Liability Act 1961?
- 2 What is the apportionment of liability between the defendants?
- 3 What is the appropriate quantum of damages for the plaintiff's injuries?
Ratio Decidendi
Both defendants are concurrent wrongdoers under Section 11 of the Civil Liability Act 1961, as their acts caused the same damage to the plaintiff, regardless of whether the incidents were successive or simultaneous. Liability is joint and several, with apportionment of 80% to Mr Finnerty and 20% to Mr Kelly.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiff against first and second defendants on a joint and several basis.
Orders
- General damages of €75,000 for knee and abdominal injuries.
- Further €7,000 for future suffering.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment