Child and Family Agency v L. & Anor (Unapproved) [2022] IECA 107 (09 May 2022)
All statutory criteria for extension of special care order were met: risk of harm continued, no suitable alternative placement existed, continued detention was necessary and in child's best interests. High Court was justified in extending order.
- Citation
- [2022] IECA 107
- Parties
- First Respondent: Child and Family Agency; Appellant: L. L.; Second Respondent: L. H.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 09 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order Extending Special Care
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Special Care Orders, Detention of Minors, Statutory Interpretation, Best Interests of the Child
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Child and Family Agency
First Respondent
L. L.
Appellant
L. H.
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order Extending Special Care
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether statutory criteria for extension of special care order under Child Care Act 1991 Part IVA were met
- 2 Whether risk of harm to child continued to exist
- 3 Whether alternative care options were adequate
Ratio Decidendi
All statutory criteria for extension of special care order were met: risk of harm continued, no suitable alternative placement existed, continued detention was necessary and in child's best interests. High Court was justified in extending order.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- High Court order extending special care confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment