LME -v- SALK & anor [2016] IEHC 712 (13 December 2016)
The child was habitually resident in England and Wales, the applicant had and was exercising rights of custody, no valid defence under Article 13 was raised, and the removal was wrongful under Article 3 of the Hague Convention. The child's views were considered but did not meet the threshold for a non-return order. Return is mandatory under Article 12.
- Citation
- [2016] IEHC 712
- Parties
- Applicant: L. M. E.; Respondent: S. A. L. K.; Notice Party: London Borough of Havering
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Child Abduction Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Child Abduction, Custody, Habitual Residence, Hague Convention, Council Regulation 2201/2003
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
L. M. E.
Applicant
S. A. L. K.
Respondent
London Borough of Havering
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Child Abduction Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the removal of the child wrongful under Article 3 of the Hague Convention?
- 2 Was the applicant exercising rights of custody at the time of removal?
- 3 Does any defence under Article 13 of the Hague Convention apply?
Ratio Decidendi
The child was habitually resident in England and Wales, the applicant had and was exercising rights of custody, no valid defence under Article 13 was raised, and the removal was wrongful under Article 3 of the Hague Convention. The child's views were considered but did not meet the threshold for a non-return order. Return is mandatory under Article 12.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Return of the child to the jurisdiction of England and Wales
- Such other orders as may facilitate the return
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment