D.P.P. v. Byrne [1998] IEHC 230 (17th November, 1998)
It is not the function of the District Court to seek the consent of the DPP to alter the offence charged; the initiative must come from the DPP. The guilt or innocence of the accused on the charge is a matter solely for the District Judge based on the facts found.
- Citation
- [1998] IEHC 230
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions; Accused: Byrne; Co Prosecutor: Hogan
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Consultative Case Stated / High Court Consultative Opinion on Case Stated From District Court
- Outcome
- Consultative opinion issued; no determination of guilt or amendment of charge made.
- Legal Topics
- Larceny, Amendment of Charges, Role of Director of Public Prosecutions, Bailee Conversion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions
Prosecutor
Byrne
Accused
Hogan
Co Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Criminal Consultative Case Stated / High Court Consultative Opinion on Case Stated From District Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused was guilty of an offence under the Larceny Act 1990 in view of Section 7 or of an attempt to commit an offence
- 2 Whether the charge should be amended to specify the contents of the bag as property of Dunnes Stores
- 3 Whether the District Judge should request the consent of the DPP before substituting an alternative charge under Section 8 of the Larceny Act 1990
Ratio Decidendi
It is not the function of the District Court to seek the consent of the DPP to alter the offence charged; the initiative must come from the DPP. The guilt or innocence of the accused on the charge is a matter solely for the District Judge based on the facts found.
Court Disposition
Consultative opinion issued; no determination of guilt or amendment of charge made.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment