DPP(at the suit of Garda Shane Curran) v Foley [2006] IEHC 11 (31 January 2006)

DPP(at the suit of Garda Shane Curran) v Foley [2006] IEHC 11 (31 January 2006)

Where the 20-minute observation period is justified as necessary for valid breath testing, it is an integral part of the lawful detention following arrest under the Road Traffic Act 1994, and no further caution or warning is required at its commencement; failure to provide such a warning does not render the detention or evidence unlawful.

Citation
[2006] IEHC 11
Parties
Prosecutor/applicant: Director of Public Prosecutions (at the suit of Garda Shane Curran); Defendant/respondent: Garrett Foley
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
31 January 2006
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Way of Case Stated / High Court Judgment on Case Stated From District Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed; District Judge's decision overturned.
Legal Topics
Lawfulness of Detention, Admissibility of Evidence, Procedural Requirements for Breath Tests, Constitutional Rights During Detention
Criminal Law Road Traffic Law Constitutional Law Lawfulness of Detention Admissibility of Evidence Procedural Requirements for Breath Tests Constitutional Rights During Detention

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Director of Public Prosecutions (at the suit of Garda Shane Curran)

Prosecutor/applicant

Garrett Foley

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal by Way of Case Stated / High Court Judgment on Case Stated From District Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a further caution or warning is required at the commencement of the 20-minute observation period for breath testing under the Road Traffic Act 1994
  2. 2 Whether failure to provide such a warning renders the detention and subsequent evidence unlawful

Ratio Decidendi

Where the 20-minute observation period is justified as necessary for valid breath testing, it is an integral part of the lawful detention following arrest under the Road Traffic Act 1994, and no further caution or warning is required at its commencement; failure to provide such a warning does not render the detention or evidence unlawful.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; District Judge's decision overturned.

Orders

  • Question in case stated answered in the negative.
  • District Judge was incorrect in dismissing the charge for the stated reasons.