LD -v- Chief Appeals Officer & ors [2014] IEHC 641 (19 December 2014)
The appeals officer is functus officio after making a decision, except for the revision power under section 317, which allows for revision in light of new facts or evidence. There is no absolute entitlement to an oral hearing at the appeal stage; the appeals officer has discretion. Section 313 provides the power to hold an oral hearing as part of a revision under section 317. The applicant's request for an oral hearing post-decision was appropriately met by the offer of a hearing for the purpose of considering revision, and the judicial review reliefs are refused.
- Citation
- [2014] IEHC 641
- Parties
- Applicant: LD; Respondents: Chief Appeals Officer Social Welfare Appeals Office Minister for Social Protection
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Reliefs refused; judicial review dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Domiciliary Care Allowance, Oral Hearing Entitlement, Appeals Procedure, Revision of Decisions, Functus Officio Doctrine
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LD
Applicant
Chief Appeals Officer Social Welfare Appeals Office Minister for Social Protection
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an applicant is entitled to an oral hearing in a social welfare appeal where the appeal is determined summarily.
- 2 Whether an appeals officer is functus officio after making a decision, save for the revision power under section 317 of the Social Welfare (Consolidation) Act 2005.
- 3 Whether an oral hearing can be held as part of a revision under section 317 in the absence of new facts or evidence.
Ratio Decidendi
The appeals officer is functus officio after making a decision, except for the revision power under section 317, which allows for revision in light of new facts or evidence. There is no absolute entitlement to an oral hearing at the appeal stage; the appeals officer has discretion. Section 313 provides the power to hold an oral hearing as part of a revision under section 317. The applicant's request for an oral hearing post-decision was appropriately met by the offer of a hearing for the purpose of considering revision, and the judicial review reliefs are refused.
Court Disposition
Reliefs refused; judicial review dismissed.
Orders
- Refusal of all reliefs sought by the applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment