Bradshaw -v- Murphy & ors [2014] IEHC 146 (26 March 2014)

Bradshaw -v- Murphy & ors [2014] IEHC 146 (26 March 2014)

The plaintiff failed to establish that damages would not be an adequate remedy for the alleged breaches of the partnership agreement, and the defendants' undertakings addressed the employment dismissal issue; therefore, interlocutory injunctions were refused.

Citation
[2014] IEHC 146
Parties
Plaintiff: Lee Bradshaw; Defendant: William Murphy; Defendant: Joseph Murphy; Defendant: Claire Murphy; Defendant: Copper Bar and Grill Limited
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
26 March 2014
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application in Civil Proceedings / Application for Interlocutory Injunction
Outcome
Plaintiff's application for interlocutory relief refused
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Dismissal From Employment, Partnership Disputes, Adequacy of Damages, Undertakings to Court

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lee Bradshaw

Plaintiff

William Murphy

Defendant

Joseph Murphy

Defendant

Claire Murphy

Defendant

Copper Bar and Grill Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application in Civil Proceedings / Application for Interlocutory Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an interlocutory injunction restraining termination of his employment
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an interlocutory injunction restraining termination of an alleged partnership

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff failed to establish that damages would not be an adequate remedy for the alleged breaches of the partnership agreement, and the defendants' undertakings addressed the employment dismissal issue; therefore, interlocutory injunctions were refused.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's application for interlocutory relief refused

Orders

  • Court notes undertakings given by defendants pending full hearing
  • Liberty to apply in relation to undertakings