Leftbrook Ltd -v- Nicholas [2013] IEHC 643 (12 December 2013)
The plaintiff failed to establish, on a prima facie basis, that its inability to pay the defendant's costs was caused by the defendant's alleged wrongdoing, as there was no detailed analysis of loss or causal connection. The requirements for special circumstances to refuse security for costs were not met. Therefore, the court ordered the plaintiff to provide security for costs.
- Citation
- [2013] IEHC 643
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Leftbrook Ltd; Defendant: Canice Nicholas
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Motion for Security for Costs / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Plaintiff ordered to provide security for costs.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Company in Liquidation, Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leftbrook Ltd
Plaintiff
Canice Nicholas
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Motion for Security for Costs / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff company should be ordered to provide security for costs under s.390 of the Companies Act 1963 and Order 29 of the Rules of the Superior Courts
- 2 Whether special circumstances exist to justify refusal of security for costs
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff failed to establish, on a prima facie basis, that its inability to pay the defendant's costs was caused by the defendant's alleged wrongdoing, as there was no detailed analysis of loss or causal connection. The requirements for special circumstances to refuse security for costs were not met. Therefore, the court ordered the plaintiff to provide security for costs.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff ordered to provide security for costs.
Orders
- Plaintiff to provide security for costs as directed by the court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment