Magee -v- Farrell & ors [2009] IESC 60 (28 July 2009)
There is no constitutional right to State-funded legal representation at a coroner's inquest. The right to legal aid recognized in The State (Healy) v Donoghue is confined to criminal proceedings where the individual's liberty is at stake and does not extend to inquisitorial or fact-finding proceedings such as inquests. The High Court decisions relied upon by the plaintiff do not support a broader constitutional entitlement to legal aid in such circumstances.
- Citation
- [2009] IESC 60
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Teresa Magee; Defendant/appellant: Brian Farrell; Defendant/appellant: Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform; Defendant/appellant: Ireland; Defendant/appellant: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside; plaintiff's claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Legal Aid, Right to Fair Procedures, Coroners Inquest, Constitutional Rights, Access to Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Teresa Magee
Plaintiff/respondent
Brian Farrell
Defendant/appellant
Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform
Defendant/appellant
Ireland
Defendant/appellant
Attorney General
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there is a constitutional right to State-funded legal representation at a coroner's inquest
- 2 Whether the right to legal aid extends beyond criminal proceedings to inquisitorial inquests
Ratio Decidendi
There is no constitutional right to State-funded legal representation at a coroner's inquest. The right to legal aid recognized in The State (Healy) v Donoghue is confined to criminal proceedings where the individual's liberty is at stake and does not extend to inquisitorial or fact-finding proceedings such as inquests. The High Court decisions relied upon by the plaintiff do not support a broader constitutional entitlement to legal aid in such circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside; plaintiff's claim dismissed
Orders
- Order of the High Court requiring State-funded legal representation for the plaintiff at the inquest is set aside
- Plaintiff's claim for State-funded legal aid at the inquest is dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment