People v. Paul Ward [1998] IEHC 154 (23rd October, 1998)

People v. Paul Ward [1998] IEHC 154 (23rd October, 1998)

The court found beyond reasonable doubt that the accused's arrests and detention were lawful, that he was provided with necessary medical attention and medication, that no physical abuse or oppression occurred during interrogation, and that the orchestrated visits by family members did not amount to oppression or unfairness. There was no basis to exclude evidence obtained from the accused's interrogations.

Citation
[1998] IEHC 154
Parties
Prosecution: The People; Accused: Paul Ward
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Ruling on Voir Dire (challenge to Legality of Arrest, Detention, and Interrogation)
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Legality of Arrest, Detention Under Offences Against the State Act 1939, Right to Fair Procedures, Admissibility of Confessions, Oppression in Police Interrogation
Criminal Law Constitutional Law Legality of Arrest Detention Under Offences Against the State Act 1939 Right to Fair Procedures Admissibility of Confessions Oppression in Police Interrogation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The People

Prosecution

Paul Ward

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Ruling on Voir Dire (challenge to Legality of Arrest, Detention, and Interrogation)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the accused's arrest and detention under Section 30 of the Offences Against the State Act, 1939 was lawful
  2. 2 Whether the accused was denied necessary medication or medical attention during detention
  3. 3 Whether the accused was subjected to physical abuse or oppression during interrogation

Ratio Decidendi

The court found beyond reasonable doubt that the accused's arrests and detention were lawful, that he was provided with necessary medical attention and medication, that no physical abuse or oppression occurred during interrogation, and that the orchestrated visits by family members did not amount to oppression or unfairness. There was no basis to exclude evidence obtained from the accused's interrogations.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The accused's application to exclude evidence on grounds of unlawful arrest, detention, or oppression is refused.