Redfern Limited -v- O'Mahony [2009] IESC 18 (04 March 2009)
Disclosure of privileged documents to third parties with a common interest and under confidentiality does not constitute waiver of privilege. Pleading reliance on legal advice, without disclosing its contents or effect, does not amount to implied waiver of privilege in Irish law. Implied waiver is limited to proceedings between client and solicitor where fairness requires disclosure.
- Citation
- [2009] IESC 18
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Redfern Limited; First Defendant: Larry O'Mahony; Second Defendant: Thomas McFeely; Third Defendant/appellant: Liam Carroll; Fourth Defendant/appellant: Tafica Limited; Fifth Defendant: Aifca Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 04 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Orders on Inspection of Documents
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside; inspection of privileged documents refused.
- Legal Topics
- Legal Professional Privilege, Waiver of Privilege, Discovery, Inspection of Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Redfern Limited
Plaintiff/respondent
Larry O'Mahony
First Defendant
Thomas McFeely
Second Defendant
Liam Carroll
Third Defendant/appellant
Tafica Limited
Fourth Defendant/appellant
Aifca Limited
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Orders on Inspection of Documents
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether disclosure of privileged documents to third parties constitutes waiver of legal professional privilege
- 2 Whether pleading reliance on legal advice amounts to implied waiver of privilege
Ratio Decidendi
Disclosure of privileged documents to third parties with a common interest and under confidentiality does not constitute waiver of privilege. Pleading reliance on legal advice, without disclosing its contents or effect, does not amount to implied waiver of privilege in Irish law. Implied waiver is limited to proceedings between client and solicitor where fairness requires disclosure.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside; inspection of privileged documents refused.
Orders
- Refused inspection of Redfern's privileged opinion to appellants.
- Refused inspection of appellants' privileged documents to Redfern.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment