Leitrim County Council v Dromaprop Ltd (Approved) [2024] IEHC 233 (29 April 2024)
The change of use from hotel to accommodation for international protection seekers is exempted development under Classes 14(h) and 20F of the Planning and Development Regulations, as the hotel use was not abandoned or extinguished, and the relevant conditions attached to the planning permission do not preclude the exemption. The legality of the change of use is not affected by internal works at variance from the permission; those are separate developments and may require retention permission, but do not render the change of use unlawful.
- Citation
- [2024] IEHC 233
- Parties
- Applicant: Leitrim County Council; Respondent: Dromaprop Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Planning Enforcement / Judgment
- Outcome
- The proposed change of use is lawful and may proceed; issues regarding internal works are modularised for further consideration.
- Legal Topics
- Exempted Development, Change of Use, Planning Permission Conditions, Accommodation for International Protection Seekers, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leitrim County Council
Applicant
Dromaprop Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Planning Enforcement / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the change of use from hotel to accommodation for international protection seekers is exempted development under Classes 14(h) and 20F
- 2 Whether the hotel use had been abandoned or extinguished
- 3 Whether conditions attached to planning permission prevent the exemption
Ratio Decidendi
The change of use from hotel to accommodation for international protection seekers is exempted development under Classes 14(h) and 20F of the Planning and Development Regulations, as the hotel use was not abandoned or extinguished, and the relevant conditions attached to the planning permission do not preclude the exemption. The legality of the change of use is not affected by internal works at variance from the permission; those are separate developments and may require retention permission, but do not render the change of use unlawful.
Court Disposition
The proposed change of use is lawful and may proceed; issues regarding internal works are modularised for further consideration.
Orders
- No order restraining the change of use; proceedings on internal works adjourned for further submissions.
- Parties invited to consider retention permission for non-conforming internal works.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment