O'Shea v. O'Buachalla [2001] IESC 203; [2001] 3 IR 137 (24 May 2001)
The District Judge acted within jurisdiction in refusing further requests for depositions after the applicant had previously exercised and then declined his entitlement; there was no evidence of prejudice or unfairness, and the refusal was a proper exercise of judicial discretion.
- Citation
- [2001] IESC 203
- Parties
- Applicant: Leonard O'Shea; First Respondent: Judge O'Buachalla; Second Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Depositions in Criminal Proceedings, Jurisdiction of District Court, Discretion of Trial Judge, Right to Fair Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leonard O'Shea
Applicant
Judge O'Buachalla
First Respondent
Director of Public Prosecutions
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the District Judge acted within jurisdiction in refusing further requests for depositions
- 2 Whether refusal to allow further depositions amounted to unfairness or breach of natural justice
Ratio Decidendi
The District Judge acted within jurisdiction in refusing further requests for depositions after the applicant had previously exercised and then declined his entitlement; there was no evidence of prejudice or unfairness, and the refusal was a proper exercise of judicial discretion.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Recommendation to Attorney General to apply the Attorney General's scheme
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment