Re Article 40.4.2 of the Constitution: Brien Applicant [2015] IEHC 753 (01 December 2015)
The applicant, being in post-conviction detention with no facial invalidity in his conviction or sentence, and having failed to raise the alleged unconstitutionality of the Juries Act 1976 at trial or on appeal, cannot invoke habeas corpus under Article 40.4.2 to challenge his detention. His remedies lie elsewhere and statutory finality has been reached.
- Citation
- [2015] IEHC 753
- Parties
- Applicant: Liam Brien
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Habeas Corpus Application / Judgment on Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Habeas Corpus, Post Conviction Detention, Unconstitutionality of Statute, Jury Composition, Jurisdictional Challenge
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Liam Brien
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Habeas Corpus Application / Judgment on Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether habeas corpus is available to challenge post-conviction detention where no facial invalidity exists in the conviction or sentence
- 2 Whether alleged unconstitutionality of the Juries Act 1976 renders the applicant's detention unlawful
- 3 Whether failure to appeal bail refusal or delay in appeal entitles applicant to habeas corpus relief
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant, being in post-conviction detention with no facial invalidity in his conviction or sentence, and having failed to raise the alleged unconstitutionality of the Juries Act 1976 at trial or on appeal, cannot invoke habeas corpus under Article 40.4.2 to challenge his detention. His remedies lie elsewhere and statutory finality has been reached.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Relief under Article 40.4.2 of the Constitution declined
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment