McNeill, Re. [2001] IEHC 204 (14 December 2001)
Cotterin's lane is a public right of way; proposed alterations and use do not unreasonably interfere with objector's rights; objections are not substantiated under statutory grounds; applicant has complied with statutory requirements for licensing declaration.
- Citation
- [2001] IEHC 204
- Parties
- Applicant: Liam McNeill; Objector: Mr. Mannix
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Liquor Licensing Application Appeal / High Court Judgment on Appeal From Circuit Court
- Outcome
- Declarations sought by applicant granted; Circuit Court order discharged.
- Legal Topics
- Liquor Licensing, Public Right of Way, Private Right of Way, Planning Permission, Objections to Licensing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Liam McNeill
Applicant
Mr. Mannix
Objector
Procedural Posture
Liquor Licensing Application Appeal / High Court Judgment on Appeal From Circuit Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Cotterin's lane is a public right of way
- 2 Whether the applicant's proposed alterations interfere with objector's rights
- 3 Adequacy of licensed premises in the neighbourhood
Ratio Decidendi
Cotterin's lane is a public right of way; proposed alterations and use do not unreasonably interfere with objector's rights; objections are not substantiated under statutory grounds; applicant has complied with statutory requirements for licensing declaration.
Court Disposition
Declarations sought by applicant granted; Circuit Court order discharged.
Orders
- Declaration that premises at No 40/40A Cornmarket Street, Cork, will be fit and convenient to be licensed as a public house and restaurant when altered as per plans.
- Discharge of Circuit Court order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment