Rogers v Director of Public Prosecutions & Ors (Approved) [2025] IEHC 94 (18 February 2025)
The applicant must demonstrate an arguable case that is not precluded by res judicata or prior High Court determinations, and the Court cannot review High Court decisions. If such an arguable case remains, a recommendation under the Scheme may be made.
- Citation
- [2025] IEHC 94
- Parties
- Applicant: Linda Rogers; Respondents: Director of Public Prosecutions & Ors
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Interlocutory Application for Recommendation Under Legal Aid Custody Issues Scheme
- Outcome
- Application for recommendation under the Legal Aid - Custody Issues Scheme noted; no final order made pending further submissions.
- Legal Topics
- Legal Aid, Judicial Review, Res Judicata, Access to Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Linda Rogers
Applicant
Director of Public Prosecutions & Ors
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Interlocutory Application for Recommendation Under Legal Aid Custody Issues Scheme
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a recommendation for legal representation under the Legal Aid - Custody Issues Scheme for a proposed judicial review
- 2 Whether the application is precluded by res judicata or prior determinations
- 3 Whether the applicant has an arguable case warranting legal assistance
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant must demonstrate an arguable case that is not precluded by res judicata or prior High Court determinations, and the Court cannot review High Court decisions. If such an arguable case remains, a recommendation under the Scheme may be made.
Court Disposition
Application for recommendation under the Legal Aid - Custody Issues Scheme noted; no final order made pending further submissions.
Orders
- Case listed for further submissions on 10 March 2025 at 12:30pm.
- Applicant invited to make submissions on whether she has an arguable case not precluded by res judicata or prior High Court determinations.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment