Coulston v Doyle (Approved) [2024] IECA 195 (26 July 2024)
The High Court possesses inherent jurisdiction to vacate a lis pendens beyond the express statutory jurisdiction under s.123 of the Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act, 2009; Mr. Coulston, as receiver, was a person affected by the lis pendens due to impediments in rent collection and property dealings; his appointment was valid; the appeal fails on all grounds.
- Citation
- [2024] IECA 195
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: John Coulston; Defendant/appellant: Patrick Doyle
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Lis Pendens, Receiver's Standing, Inherent Jurisdiction, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Coulston
Plaintiff/respondent
Patrick Doyle
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has inherent jurisdiction to vacate a lis pendens beyond statutory powers under s.123 of the Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act, 2009
- 2 Whether Mr. Coulston, as receiver, is a 'person affected' by the lis pendens under s.123
- 3 Whether Mr. Coulston was validly appointed as receiver over the property
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court possesses inherent jurisdiction to vacate a lis pendens beyond the express statutory jurisdiction under s.123 of the Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act, 2009; Mr. Coulston, as receiver, was a person affected by the lis pendens due to impediments in rent collection and property dealings; his appointment was valid; the appeal fails on all grounds.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Order vacating the lis pendens
- Order restraining the appellant from registering any further lis pendens in relation to Folio 21063F, County Carlow
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment