Litigation Finance Ltd -v- Lehane [2016] IEHC 527 (03 October 2016)
Applicant failed to provide sufficient particulars of the claims, their nature, or value, and did not establish an interest within the meaning of s. 61(7); therefore, lacks standing to bring the application and the motion is refused.
- Citation
- [2016] IEHC 527
- Parties
- Applicant: Litigation Finance Limited; Respondent (official Assignee): Christopher Lehane
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 03 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application / High Court Judgment on Motion for Assignment of Chose in Action
- Outcome
- Application refused for lack of standing.
- Legal Topics
- Assignment of Claims, Standing (locus Standi), Choses in Action, Section 61(7) Bankruptcy Act 1988
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Litigation Finance Limited
Applicant
Christopher Lehane
Respondent (official Assignee)
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application / High Court Judgment on Motion for Assignment of Chose in Action
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the applicant have standing under s. 61(7) of the Bankruptcy Act 1988 to seek assignment of claims?
- 2 Is the applicant's offer sufficient to establish an interest under s. 61(7)?
- 3 Should the Official Assignee be ordered to assign the chose in action to the applicant?
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant failed to provide sufficient particulars of the claims, their nature, or value, and did not establish an interest within the meaning of s. 61(7); therefore, lacks standing to bring the application and the motion is refused.
Court Disposition
Application refused for lack of standing.
Orders
- No order for assignment of chose in action.
- Applicant may renew application if sufficient information is provided.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment