P.C. v The Minister for Health & Ors [2020] IECA 28 (19 February 2020)
The appellant was not deprived of hearing notice, failed to attend due to negligence, had no locus standi to bring proceedings affecting his mother, and the President acted within jurisdiction and appropriately managed the proceedings; the appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- [2020] IECA 28
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: P. C.; Defendant/respondent: The Minister for Health; Defendant/respondent: Health Services Executive; Defendant/respondent: Catherine White; Defendant/respondent: Tom Tobin; Defendant/respondent: Norma Harnedy; Defendant/respondent: General Solicitor for Minors and Wards of Court; Defendant/respondent: Patrice O’Keeffe; Defendant/respondent: Registrar of Wards of Court; Defendant/respondent: Ireland; Defendant/respondent: Aoife Ní Chorcorain; Defendant/respondent: Lynn Oliver; Defendant/respondent: Josie Clare; Defendant/respondent: Tony McNamara
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Locus Standi, Case Management, Fair Procedures, Abuse of Process, Representation of Persons Under Disability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P. C.
Plaintiff/appellant
The Minister for Health
Defendant/respondent
Health Services Executive
Defendant/respondent
Catherine White
Defendant/respondent
Tom Tobin
Defendant/respondent
Norma Harnedy
Defendant/respondent
General Solicitor for Minors and Wards of Court
Defendant/respondent
Patrice O’Keeffe
Defendant/respondent
Registrar of Wards of Court
Defendant/respondent
Ireland
Defendant/respondent
Aoife Ní Chorcorain
Defendant/respondent
Lynn Oliver
Defendant/respondent
Josie Clare
Defendant/respondent
Tony McNamara
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was deprived of hearing notice and taken by surprise regarding the hearing date
- 2 Whether the appellant had locus standi to bring proceedings affecting his mother
- 3 Whether the President had jurisdiction to make the order under appeal given the invalidity of the original wardship order
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was not deprived of hearing notice, failed to attend due to negligence, had no locus standi to bring proceedings affecting his mother, and the President acted within jurisdiction and appropriately managed the proceedings; the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Plaintiff's application dismissed
- Proceedings stayed; plaintiff may take no further steps except on application to the court with notice to defendants
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment