Costello v Minister for Agriculture, Food, and The Marine & Anor (Approved) [2021] IEHC 735 (24 November 2021)
The applicant failed to demonstrate good and sufficient reason for not bringing her judicial review challenge to the Replanting Order within the prescribed time after being notified by the Forestry Appeals Committee that it would not deal with her challenge. No breach of fair procedures occurred in the FAC appeal process, as the applicant had access to all relevant documentation and suffered no prejudice. The Minister's failure to provide notice and opportunity to be heard before issuing the Replanting Order was ameliorated by the applicant's prior knowledge via FOI, but this does not always suffice; however, relief was refused due to delay.
- Citation
- [2021] IEHC 735
- Parties
- Applicant: Lorraine Costello; First Respondent: Minister for Agriculture, Food & The Marine; Second Respondent: Forestry Appeals Committee
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Relief refused
- Legal Topics
- Fair Procedures, Judicial Review, Forestry Regulation, Replanting Orders, Licence Revocation, Extension of Time
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lorraine Costello
Applicant
Minister for Agriculture, Food & The Marine
First Respondent
Forestry Appeals Committee
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Forestry Appeals Committee breached fair procedures in handling the applicant's appeal
- 2 Whether the Minister breached fair procedures in issuing a Replanting Order without notice or opportunity to be heard
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to an extension of time to challenge the Replanting Order
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to demonstrate good and sufficient reason for not bringing her judicial review challenge to the Replanting Order within the prescribed time after being notified by the Forestry Appeals Committee that it would not deal with her challenge. No breach of fair procedures occurred in the FAC appeal process, as the applicant had access to all relevant documentation and suffered no prejudice. The Minister's failure to provide notice and opportunity to be heard before issuing the Replanting Order was ameliorated by the applicant's prior knowledge via FOI, but this does not always suffice; however, relief was refused due to delay.
Court Disposition
Relief refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment