D.P.P.-v- Lynda Lee [2004] IECCA 18 (20 July 2004)

D.P.P.-v- Lynda Lee [2004] IECCA 18 (20 July 2004)

The conviction was unsafe due to the absence of a formal identification parade, lack of explanation for its omission, and insufficient jury directions regarding the frailties of visual identification. These errors were fundamental to the fairness of the trial.

Citation
[2004] IECCA 18
Parties
Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions; Applicant: Lynda Lee
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
20 July 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction
Outcome
conviction quashed, no re-trial ordered
Legal Topics
Visual Identification, Fair Trial, Identification Parade, Jury Directions
Criminal Law Visual Identification Fair Trial Identification Parade Jury Directions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Director of Public Prosecutions

Respondent

Lynda Lee

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction was unsafe due to inadequate identification procedures
  2. 2 Whether the absence of a formal identification parade rendered the identification unreliable
  3. 3 Whether the trial judge's directions to the jury on identification were sufficient

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction was unsafe due to the absence of a formal identification parade, lack of explanation for its omission, and insufficient jury directions regarding the frailties of visual identification. These errors were fundamental to the fairness of the trial.

Court Disposition

conviction quashed, no re-trial ordered

Orders

  • conviction and sentence quashed
  • no re-trial