M.M. v A University (Approved) [2024] IEHC 664 (12 November 2024)
The Court ordered anonymisation and restrictions on publication to protect the privacy and reputation of students not party to the proceedings, while leaving open the possibility of in camera hearings and future variation of the order, balancing privacy interests against open justice.
- Citation
- [2024] IEHC 664
- Parties
- Plaintiff: M. M.; Defendant: A University
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Order
- Outcome
- interlocutory order granted
- Legal Topics
- Anonymisation, Pseudonymisation, In Camera Hearings, Freedom of Information, Protection of Reputation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M. M.
Plaintiff
A University
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proceedings should be anonymised or pseudonymised to protect privacy and reputation of students
- 2 Balancing privacy rights against the principle of open justice and freedom of information
Ratio Decidendi
The Court ordered anonymisation and restrictions on publication to protect the privacy and reputation of students not party to the proceedings, while leaving open the possibility of in camera hearings and future variation of the order, balancing privacy interests against open justice.
Court Disposition
interlocutory order granted
Orders
- Proceedings entitled 'M. M. v A University'
- Restriction on publication of faculty, year, university, and identifying details
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment