M.M. v J.D. [2013] IEHC 639 (26 July 2013)
The Irish High Court has jurisdiction to grant provisional protective measures over assets situated in Ireland pending the determination of substantive divorce proceedings in England, pursuant to Article 20 of Council Regulation EC 2201/2003 and the inherent jurisdiction of the court, notwithstanding the non-recognition of the English divorce for ancillary relief purposes under Irish law.
- Citation
- [2013] IEHC 639
- Parties
- Applicant: M. M.; Respondent: J. D.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Notice of Motion / Interlocutory Application for Injunctive Relief Pending Determination of Divorce Proceedings
- Outcome
- Court holds it has jurisdiction to grant provisional protective measures; further submissions to be heard before making orders.
- Legal Topics
- Provisional and Protective Measures, Jurisdiction, Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments, Injunctive Relief, Divorce Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M. M.
Applicant
J. D.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Originating Notice of Motion / Interlocutory Application for Injunctive Relief Pending Determination of Divorce Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Irish High Court has jurisdiction to grant provisional protective measures over assets pending foreign divorce proceedings
- 2 Interpretation of Article 20 of Council Regulation EC 2201/2003
- 3 Effect of non-recognition of foreign divorce on ancillary relief
Ratio Decidendi
The Irish High Court has jurisdiction to grant provisional protective measures over assets situated in Ireland pending the determination of substantive divorce proceedings in England, pursuant to Article 20 of Council Regulation EC 2201/2003 and the inherent jurisdiction of the court, notwithstanding the non-recognition of the English divorce for ancillary relief purposes under Irish law.
Court Disposition
Court holds it has jurisdiction to grant provisional protective measures; further submissions to be heard before making orders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment