McN. -v- R. [2015] IEHC 70 (02 February 2015)
The Irish High Court does not have jurisdiction to vary or enforce access orders made by the English High Court under the Hague Convention where no such access order exists; the undertakings and views recorded in the English order are not binding access orders. The appropriate forum for determination of access and enforcement issues is the District Court in Ireland, where the children are habitually resident.
- Citation
- [2015] IEHC 70
- Parties
- Plaintiff: M. McN.; Defendant: J. R.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law / Child Abduction Enforcement / Judgment on Motion to Attach and Commit Defendant for Non Compliance With Mirror Order
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's motion for attachment and committal of the defendant is struck out; previous order for attachment vacated.
- Legal Topics
- Child Abduction, Jurisdiction, Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, Access Orders, Hague Convention
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M. McN.
Plaintiff
J. R.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Family Law / Child Abduction Enforcement / Judgment on Motion to Attach and Commit Defendant for Non Compliance With Mirror Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Irish High Court has jurisdiction to vary or enforce access orders made by the English High Court under the Hague Convention
- 2 Whether the undertakings and views recorded in the English order constitute enforceable access orders in Ireland
- 3 Appropriate forum for determination of access and enforcement issues
Ratio Decidendi
The Irish High Court does not have jurisdiction to vary or enforce access orders made by the English High Court under the Hague Convention where no such access order exists; the undertakings and views recorded in the English order are not binding access orders. The appropriate forum for determination of access and enforcement issues is the District Court in Ireland, where the children are habitually resident.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's motion for attachment and committal of the defendant is struck out; previous order for attachment vacated.
Orders
- Order of 12 December 2014 for attachment of defendant vacated.
- Motion for attachment and committal struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment