M v M (Approved) [2020] IEHC 609 (25 November 2020)
The court finds the maintenance proposed by the appellant is insufficient to meet the needs of three children and orders maintenance at the respondent's proposed level, allowing mortgage and orthodontic costs to be met from credit union accounts pending appeal.
- Citation
- [2020] IEHC 609
- Parties
- Respondent: M; Appellant: M
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Variation of Maintenance Pending Appeal / Interim Order Prior to Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Interim variation of maintenance order pending substantive appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Maintenance, Variation of Maintenance, Interim Orders, Judicial Separation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M
Respondent
M
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Application for Variation of Maintenance Pending Appeal / Interim Order Prior to Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether maintenance payable by appellant should be varied pending appeal
- 2 Appropriate use of children's credit union accounts for mortgage and orthodontic expenses
- 3 Assessment of parties' financial positions for interim maintenance
Ratio Decidendi
The court finds the maintenance proposed by the appellant is insufficient to meet the needs of three children and orders maintenance at the respondent's proposed level, allowing mortgage and orthodontic costs to be met from credit union accounts pending appeal.
Court Disposition
Interim variation of maintenance order pending substantive appeal.
Orders
- Monthly maintenance set at respondent's proposed figure.
- Mortgage payments and orthodontic costs to be paid from children's credit union accounts.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment