M v The Parole Board & ors (Unapproved) [2020] IESC 24 (12 May 2020)
Section 2 of the Criminal Justice Act 1960, as amended, does not apply to prisoners transferred to the Central Mental Hospital under the Criminal Law (Insanity) Act 2006. The CMH is not a prison or a place provided under the relevant prison statutes. The statutory framework does not permit the Minister to grant temporary release or parole to such prisoners while they are detained in the CMH. The appellant's exclusion from parole consideration is a consequence of the statutory scheme and not a breach of constitutional or ECHR rights. The Minister's discretion is limited by statute and was not unlawfully fettered.
- Citation
- [2020] IESC 24
- Parties
- Appellant: M.; Respondent: The Parole Board; Respondent: The Minister for Justice & Equality
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Parole Eligibility, Temporary Release, Prisoners With Mental Illness, Statutory Interpretation, Executive Discretion, Equality Guarantee, European Convention on Human Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M.
Appellant
The Parole Board
Respondent
The Minister for Justice & Equality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a long-term prisoner transferred to the Central Mental Hospital for mental illness is entitled to be considered for conditional release or parole.
- 2 Whether the Minister for Justice has the statutory power to grant temporary release to such a prisoner under s.2 of the Criminal Justice Act 1960.
- 3 Whether exclusion from parole consideration breaches constitutional or ECHR rights.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 2 of the Criminal Justice Act 1960, as amended, does not apply to prisoners transferred to the Central Mental Hospital under the Criminal Law (Insanity) Act 2006. The CMH is not a prison or a place provided under the relevant prison statutes. The statutory framework does not permit the Minister to grant temporary release or parole to such prisoners while they are detained in the CMH. The appellant's exclusion from parole consideration is a consequence of the statutory scheme and not a breach of constitutional or ECHR rights. The Minister's discretion is limited by statute and was not unlawfully fettered.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment