Jones v Maher & Anor [2020] IEHC 106 (27 January 2020)
The defendants failed to provide any plausible explanation for non-compliance with the discovery order and failed to establish any arguable ground of appeal. The Master erred in extending time for appeal, and the plaintiff's appeal is allowed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] IEHC 106
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Malcolm Trever Jones; Defendant: Nicholas Maher; Defendant: Nicholas Martin Maher
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Extension of Time to Appeal
- Outcome
- plaintiff's appeal allowed; extension of time for appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Discovery, Breach of Contract, Appeal Procedure
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Malcolm Trever Jones
Plaintiff
Nicholas Maher
Defendant
Nicholas Martin Maher
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Extension of Time to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Master of the High Court erred in extending time for appeal against the Circuit Court's decision
- 2 Whether the defendants had an arguable ground of appeal for reinstatement of their defence after failure to make discovery
Ratio Decidendi
The defendants failed to provide any plausible explanation for non-compliance with the discovery order and failed to establish any arguable ground of appeal. The Master erred in extending time for appeal, and the plaintiff's appeal is allowed.
Court Disposition
plaintiff's appeal allowed; extension of time for appeal refused
Orders
- Master's order extending time for appeal set aside
- Plaintiff's appeal granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment