Lyons -v- Delaney & Ors [2016] IECA 393 (15 December 2016)
The High Court order striking out the third party notice was a final order in the sense that it finally disposed of a discrete issue between the parties, and therefore, special leave is required to adduce further evidence on appeal.
- Citation
- [2016] IECA 393
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Margaret Lyons; Defendant/appellant: John Delaney; Defendant/appellant: Anthony Locke; Defendant/appellant: Patrick Thorpe; Defendant/appellant: Delaney Locke and Thorpe (A Firm); Third Party: Cathal O’Sullivan; Third Party: Paraic O’Kennedy practising under the style and title of O’Sullivan & Associates
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision to Strike Out Third Party Notice
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed as of right to adduce further evidence; special leave required.
- Legal Topics
- Third Party Procedure, Adducing Evidence on Appeal, Interlocutory Vs Final Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Margaret Lyons
Plaintiff
John Delaney
Defendant/appellant
Anthony Locke
Defendant/appellant
Patrick Thorpe
Defendant/appellant
Delaney Locke and Thorpe (A Firm)
Defendant/appellant
Cathal O’Sullivan
Third Party
Paraic O’Kennedy practising under the style and title of O’Sullivan & Associates
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision to Strike Out Third Party Notice
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court order striking out the third party notice was interlocutory or final for the purposes of adducing further evidence on appeal without special leave
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court order striking out the third party notice was a final order in the sense that it finally disposed of a discrete issue between the parties, and therefore, special leave is required to adduce further evidence on appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed as of right to adduce further evidence; special leave required.
Orders
- Appellant not entitled to adduce fresh evidence on appeal without special leave.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment