Cribbin -v- PLC Ingredients Ltd & Anor [2012] IEHC 390 (03 October 2012)
The relief sought was not appropriate for interlocutory application as it would not maintain the status quo pending trial, and the plaintiff did not demonstrate a strong case that the employer acted wrongfully in terminating the investigator's appointment. The court would be departing from its equitable jurisdiction by granting the order.
- Citation
- [2012] IEHC 390
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mark Cribbin; First Defendant: PLC Ingredients Limited; Second Defendant: Vincent O’Sullivan
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 03 October 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application for Interlocutory Injunction
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Injunctions, Disciplinary Procedures, Employment Suspension, Natural Justice, Contractual Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Cribbin
Plaintiff
PLC Ingredients Limited
First Defendant
Vincent O’Sullivan
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application for Interlocutory Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court should grant an interlocutory injunction directing reinstatement of an independent investigator in an employment disciplinary process
- 2 Whether unilateral termination of the investigator's appointment by the employer was wrongful
Ratio Decidendi
The relief sought was not appropriate for interlocutory application as it would not maintain the status quo pending trial, and the plaintiff did not demonstrate a strong case that the employer acted wrongfully in terminating the investigator's appointment. The court would be departing from its equitable jurisdiction by granting the order.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Order dismissing the application for interlocutory injunction
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment