DPP -v- Mark Drinkwater [2007] IECCA 84 (31 July 2007)
The applicant did not establish that the trial judge made a definitive statement promising a non-custodial sentence, nor that the sentencing process was complete at adjournment. The trial judge considered all relevant factors, including the probation report and mitigating circumstances. There was no error in principle or excess in the custodial sentence imposed. The applicant's sense of grievance was not legitimate in the circumstances.
- Citation
- [2007] IECCA 84
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions; Applicant: Mark Drinkwater
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Appeals, Burglary, Mitigating Factors, Sense of Grievance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions
Prosecutor
Mark Drinkwater
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant had a legitimate sense of grievance due to the trial judge's sentencing procedure
- 2 Whether the custodial sentence imposed was excessive or wrong in principle
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant did not establish that the trial judge made a definitive statement promising a non-custodial sentence, nor that the sentencing process was complete at adjournment. The trial judge considered all relevant factors, including the probation report and mitigating circumstances. There was no error in principle or excess in the custodial sentence imposed. The applicant's sense of grievance was not legitimate in the circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
- Custodial sentence of two years imprisonment affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment