Criminal Assets Bureau v Foley [2019] IECA 287 (20 November 2019)
The appellant failed to establish inordinate and inexcusable delay or specific prejudice sufficient to defeat the respondent's claim for interest; the delay, though arguably inordinate, was not shown to be inexcusable, and the appellant always had the power to stop interest by paying the tax. The balance of justice does not require preventing recovery of interest.
- Citation
- [2019] IECA 287
- Parties
- Respondent: The Criminal Assets Bureau; Appellant: Martin Foley
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Delay in Prosecution, Interest on Tax Liability, Statutory Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Criminal Assets Bureau
Respondent
Martin Foley
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether inordinate and inexcusable delay by the respondent precludes recovery of interest on tax liability
- 2 Whether the appellant has an arguable defence to the claim for interest based on delay
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to establish inordinate and inexcusable delay or specific prejudice sufficient to defeat the respondent's claim for interest; the delay, though arguably inordinate, was not shown to be inexcusable, and the appellant always had the power to stop interest by paying the tax. The balance of justice does not require preventing recovery of interest.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; High Court order granting liberty to enter final judgment for €738,449.27 affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment