Horan v. O'Reilly & Ors [2004] IEHC 425 (3 December 2004)
The plaintiff remained a member of the syndicate as the established practice permitted arrears, he paid arrears when requested, and there was no clear evidence he was excluded; thus, he is entitled to a one-fifth share of the lottery winnings.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] IEHC 425
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Martin Horan; Defendant: Frank O'Reilly; Defendant: Michael McHale; Defendant: John Joyce; Defendant: Seamus O'Brien; Defendant: An Post National Lottery Company
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 03 December 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Lottery Syndicate Disputes, Beneficial Ownership, Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty, Estoppel
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin Horan
Plaintiff
Frank O'Reilly
Defendant
Michael McHale
Defendant
John Joyce
Defendant
Seamus O'Brien
Defendant
An Post National Lottery Company
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff remained a member of the lottery syndicate at the time of the winning ticket
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a share of the lottery winnings
- 3 Whether arrears in payment excluded the plaintiff from the syndicate
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff remained a member of the syndicate as the established practice permitted arrears, he paid arrears when requested, and there was no clear evidence he was excluded; thus, he is entitled to a one-fifth share of the lottery winnings.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff
Orders
- Declaration that the plaintiff is beneficial owner of one fifth of the National Lottery Lotto Jackpot of 6 January 2001
- Monies held to be paid to the plaintiff together with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment