Ferris -v- Hui & ors [2016] IEHC 227 (25 April 2016)
The delay in commencing the application was unfair and prejudicial to the respondents, particularly given the father's deteriorating health and lack of evidence of wrongdoing; the public interest in restriction was outweighed by injustice caused by the delay.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] IEHC 227
- Parties
- Applicant: Martin V. Ferris; Respondent: David Hui; Respondent: Kevin Hui; Respondent: Julie Hui
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 25 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Companies Act for Restriction of Directors / Judgment on Application
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Director Restriction, Liquidation, Delay in Proceedings, Fair Hearing
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin V. Ferris
Applicant
David Hui
Respondent
Kevin Hui
Respondent
Julie Hui
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application Under Companies Act for Restriction of Directors / Judgment on Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether delay in bringing the application justifies refusal of restriction declarations
- 2 Whether respondents' conduct as directors was responsible
- 3 Impact of destruction of company records on directors' responsibility
Ratio Decidendi
The delay in commencing the application was unfair and prejudicial to the respondents, particularly given the father's deteriorating health and lack of evidence of wrongdoing; the public interest in restriction was outweighed by injustice caused by the delay.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- Court declines to make the declarations sought under s.819 of the Companies Act, 2014
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment