Sherlock Mongans & Anor v Clare County Council (Approved) [2025] IEHC 427 (25 July 2025)
The Council lawfully discharged its statutory duties by making six reasonable offers of emergency accommodation. Once such offers were made and refused, the applicants ceased to be homeless under section 2 of the Housing Act 1988, ending the Council's obligations. The Court found no evidence of arbitrary or...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] IEHC 427
- Parties
- Applicant: Martina Sherlock Mongans; Applicant: Bobby Sherlock; Applicant: BS (minor); Applicant: KS (minor); Applicant: MS (minor); Applicant: JS (minor); Applicant: ES (minor); Respondent: Clare County Council; Respondent: Minister for Housing; Respondent: Ireland; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment on Application for Leave and Substantive Reliefs
- Outcome
- Application for leave and substantive reliefs refused
- Legal Topics
- Emergency Accommodation, Homelessness, Judicial Review, Discrimination, Traveller Community, Statutory Duties of Local Authorities, Choice Based Letting System, Equal Status Act, Human Rights and Equality Commission Act
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martina Sherlock Mongans
Applicant
Bobby Sherlock
Applicant
BS (minor)
Applicant
KS (minor)
Applicant
MS (minor)
Applicant
JS (minor)
Applicant
ES (minor)
Applicant
Clare County Council
Respondent
Minister for Housing
Respondent
Ireland
Respondent
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment on Application for Leave and Substantive Reliefs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Clare County Council breached statutory duties in provision of emergency accommodation
- 2 Whether refusal of emergency accommodation offers affects homelessness status under Housing Act 1988
- 3 Whether applicants are entitled to access social housing via Choice Based Letting System as emergency accommodation
Ratio Decidendi
The Council lawfully discharged its statutory duties by making six reasonable offers of emergency accommodation. Once such offers were made and refused, the applicants ceased to be homeless under section 2 of the Housing Act 1988, ending the Council's obligations. The Court found no evidence of arbitrary or unreasonable conduct by the Council. No justiciable claim was established against the State respondents. The applicants are not entitled to require emergency accommodation from social housing stock or to dictate the booking system. No cause of action arises under section 42 of the Human Rights and Equality Commission Act 2014.
Court Disposition
Application for leave and substantive reliefs refused
Orders
- Matter listed for final orders at 10.00am on 30 July 2025 to facilitate any appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment