Byrne v. Bus Atha Cliath & Anor [2005] IEHC 20 (2 February 2005)
A defendant cannot insist on retaining a co-defendant in proceedings when the plaintiff has accepted their removal and there is no issue between the defendants or notice of indemnity/contribution served.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] IEHC 20
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mary Byrne; Defendant: Bus Átha Cliath; Defendant: Motor Insurance Bureau of Ireland
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Circuit Court to High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Joinder of Parties, Motor Insurance Bureau of Ireland Agreement, European Directives on Uninsured Motorists, Appeals Procedure
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Byrne
Plaintiff
Bus Átha Cliath
Defendant
Motor Insurance Bureau of Ireland
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Circuit Court to High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Motor Insurance Bureau of Ireland (MIBI) should remain as a defendant in proceedings where the plaintiff has accepted its removal by the Circuit Court
- 2 Whether the first-named defendant (Bus Átha Cliath) can maintain an appeal to keep MIBI as a co-defendant despite the plaintiff's acceptance of the Circuit Court's decision
Ratio Decidendi
A defendant cannot insist on retaining a co-defendant in proceedings when the plaintiff has accepted their removal and there is no issue between the defendants or notice of indemnity/contribution served.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal by Bus Átha Cliath is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment